At 01:21 AM 12/3/2004, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:

>First of all, we've already almost agreed on GTTs.

Yes, but we got into this because we had a sponsor for the
feature. It turns out that the sponsor doesn't want what
we're agreeing on.

>As a personal note, I'd stick with <created LTTs> as session-scope objects
>and <declared LTTs> as routine-scope objects to make everyone happy. This is
>one of those very rare cases when I avoid following the standard exacty and
>treat it the way it's valuable for us and our users.

If we choose to implement a non-standard feature, we should
not bend the language of the standard to fit our feature but
should implement it with our own language. Always.

Regards,


Ann