Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Counter proposal to Temporary tables |
---|---|
Author | Dmitry Yemanov |
Post date | 2004-12-01T15:34:57Z |
"Ann W. Harrison" <aharrison@...> wrote:
Dmitry
>Except LTTs in terms of some guys here.
> 2) that the definitions of temporary tables are visible
> to all attachments, and
> 4) that a reasonable implementation of temporary tablesWell, one of them ;-)
> is to add a (magic, invisible) field to the table
> that identifies records as belonging to a connection
> why do we need temporary tables at all?Because we need a powerful fast feature instead of a workaround.
Dmitry