Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Counter proposal to Temporary tables |
---|---|
Author | Vlad Horsun |
Post date | 2004-12-01T10:03:08Z |
> with the limitations above, not much. But I am a little lost as to howSorry, i don't know about "original requirements from Volker Rehn"
> the original requirements from Volker Rehn generated this whole
> discussion about SQL standard temporary tables. They're not whatIs this that what i named 'local declared temporary tables' ?
> Volker needs, and not what people generally ask for when asking for
> "temporary tables" in the support list. Nobody needs temporary tables
> if they come with constraints 1, 2 and 4 above attached, so why
> bother? Scoped table/cursor variables (with table/cursor as a
> datatype) are what Firebird needs IMHO.
Regards,
Vlad