Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Counter proposal to Temporary tables |
---|---|
Author | Ann W. Harrison |
Post date | 2004-11-30T22:22Z |
At 03:42 PM 11/30/2004, Vlad Horsun wrote:
Sorry, I wasn't clear. We agreed that Nicholay's
implementation was possible. We did not agree that it
was the best.
Regards,
Ann
> > Given that we've largely agreedVlad,
> ...
> > 4) that a reasonable implementation of temporary tables
> > is to add a (magic, invisible) field to the table
> > that identifies records as belonging to a connection
>
> Sorry, i missed that moment where we came to such
>conclusion...
Sorry, I wasn't clear. We agreed that Nicholay's
implementation was possible. We did not agree that it
was the best.
Regards,
Ann