|Subject||Re: [Firebird-Architect] Counter proposal to Temporary tables|
> Given that we've largely agreed...
> 4) that a reasonable implementation of temporary tablesSorry, i missed that moment where we came to such
> is to add a (magic, invisible) field to the table
> that identifies records as belonging to a connection
conclusion... Yes we discussed it but we also have another
idea of implementation. When we stopped and agreed ?