Subject Re: [Firebird-Architect] Re: Counter proposal to Temporary tables
Author Ann W. Harrison
At 02:24 PM 11/30/2004, paulruizendaal wrote:

>You have pretty much summed up how I wanted to do temporary tables
>for Fyracle....
>I guess this means too that it is conceivable to do a workable
>implementation of temp tables by upgrading only the DSQL module. It
>might be hard on the tool people, though.

In Vulcan, DSQL is no longer a wart hanging on the side of the
engine, but an integral part of it, so that's not really an option.