Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Re: Counter proposal to Temporary tables |
---|---|
Author | Ann W. Harrison |
Post date | 2004-11-30T19:55:22Z |
At 02:24 PM 11/30/2004, paulruizendaal wrote:
engine, but an integral part of it, so that's not really an option.
Regards,
Ann
>You have pretty much summed up how I wanted to do temporary tablesIn Vulcan, DSQL is no longer a wart hanging on the side of the
>for Fyracle....
>I guess this means too that it is conceivable to do a workable
>implementation of temp tables by upgrading only the DSQL module. It
>might be hard on the tool people, though.
engine, but an integral part of it, so that's not really an option.
Regards,
Ann