Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] RFC: Proposal for the implementation |
---|---|
Author | Ann W. Harrison |
Post date | 2004-11-26T19:32:06Z |
At 08:38 AM 11/25/2004, Vlad Horsun wrote:
have specific syntax and semantic, and are not equivalent
to either triggers or stored procedures. We don't follow
any of the other scoping rules for modules in stored
procedures. Why try to shoehorn this one in?
Regards,
Ann
> Can we interpret standard's declared local temporary tables (DLTT)In a word, no. Modules are really quite clearly defined,
>as local variables of stored procedures \ triggers ?
have specific syntax and semantic, and are not equivalent
to either triggers or stored procedures. We don't follow
any of the other scoping rules for modules in stored
procedures. Why try to shoehorn this one in?
Regards,
Ann