Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Table partitioning |
---|---|
Author | Ann W. Harrison |
Post date | 2004-11-18T17:11:27Z |
At 03:44 AM 11/18/2004, Jan Radl wrote:
examined in some depth previously. You should probably check the
list archives (searchable at ibphoenix.com). Basically, table spaces
are a necessary evil for some database architectures and less so
for others which benefit more from a disk-side solution like RAID.
Regards,
Ann
>I would like to ask you if youYou've probably guessed by the responses that this topic has been
>plan to implement somethink like table partitioning (Oracle, ASE, DB2
>has this option). This is only think we missed in Firebird 1.5 (or we
>don't know how to use it). This is very usefull when you insert or
>delete a lot of data from several connections into the same tables.
examined in some depth previously. You should probably check the
list archives (searchable at ibphoenix.com). Basically, table spaces
are a necessary evil for some database architectures and less so
for others which benefit more from a disk-side solution like RAID.
Regards,
Ann