Carlos Guzmán Álvarez wrote:

>Hello:
>
>
>
>>A network "port" object for ssl could be created in the existing
>>remote implementation architecture, though a little research might be
>>necessary to handle the auxiliary sockets for events, but it wouldn't
>>handle backwards compatibilities.
>>
>>
>
>Excuse my ignorance, why not ??
>
>
>

Because old clients don't have SSL code in them.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]