Hello:

>The goal of this proposal is to twofold. First, it is a compatible
>extension to the remote protocol to handle the problems of encryption
>and (if desired) data compression. Second, it is a reformulation of the
>remote implementation architecture to simplify and support future growth.
>

Just a minor question, If this is for the remote protocol
why not use SSL/TLS ??

--
Best regards

Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain

"In the end there can be only one" (Highlander)