Subject | RE: [Firebird-Architect] Feature Request: Domains in SP & Triggers. |
---|---|
Author | Helen Borrie |
Post date | 2004-10-12T09:33:03Z |
At 05:56 AM 12/10/2004 -0400, Claudio wrote:
the lexicon...but it also helps to make it clearer to the dilettantes that
a domain is not a user-defined data type but a reusable definition.
Helen
>Pretending that all the functionality in the engine can be used withoutUsing BASED ON would make a lot of sense. For one thing, it's already in
>reading a bit of documentation is too optimistic, don't you think?
>
>Would you be happy with BASED ON functionality? This way, it would take only
>the data type and everybody's clear it's not the whole domain.
the lexicon...but it also helps to make it clearer to the dilettantes that
a domain is not a user-defined data type but a reusable definition.
Helen