Subject | RE: [Firebird-Architect] Re: UTF-8 vs UTF-16 |
---|---|
Author | David Schnepper |
Post date | 2003-08-26T03:07:10Z |
Anyone that thinks they need a 16K character column is
smoking something which the State of California says
is OK for medical purposes, but the federal
government disagrees.
Such a beast belongs in a blob - and use of blobs
in expressions (where upper(blob) like '%FOO%')
should have better support.
Seriously, who needs a row of data that large?
Dave
smoking something which the State of California says
is OK for medical purposes, but the federal
government disagrees.
Such a beast belongs in a blob - and use of blobs
in expressions (where upper(blob) like '%FOO%')
should have better support.
Seriously, who needs a row of data that large?
Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roman Rokytskyy [mailto:rrokytskyy@...]
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 8:54 AM
> To: Firebird-Architect@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Firebird-Architect] Re: UTF-8 vs UTF-16
>
>
> > > I think that Firebird engine could (and should) become completely
> > > UNICODE-16. No zoo of charsets, no multibyte encodings with a sword
> > > of Damocles of buffer overflows.
>
> c) Current limitation of CHAR and VARCHAR columns is ~32,000 bytes.
> Saying that each character needs 2 bytes, you decrease this boundary
> to ~16,000.
>
> Roman
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Firebird-Architect-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>