Subject | UTF-8 vs UTF-16 |
---|---|
Author | Nickolay Samofatov |
Post date | 2003-08-15T17:15:05Z |
Hello, Peter !
Forgot to ask. What encoding are you really going to implement ?
Currently engine implements UNICODE_FSS, not UTF8.
You propose UCS2, not UTF16, right ?
I want to remind you that UTF8 character may occupy 1-6 bytes.
UTF16 character may occupy 1-3 two-byte words.
Both UNICODE_FSS and USC2 are now obsolete. So fixing MBCS support
inside the firebird engine is very important.
--
Best regards,
Nickolay Samofatov mailto:skidder@...
Forgot to ask. What encoding are you really going to implement ?
Currently engine implements UNICODE_FSS, not UTF8.
You propose UCS2, not UTF16, right ?
I want to remind you that UTF8 character may occupy 1-6 bytes.
UTF16 character may occupy 1-3 two-byte words.
Both UNICODE_FSS and USC2 are now obsolete. So fixing MBCS support
inside the firebird engine is very important.
--
Best regards,
Nickolay Samofatov mailto:skidder@...