Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] None local database file |
---|---|
Author | Daniel Rail |
Post date | 2003-07-30T10:43:04Z |
Hello Klement,
Wednesday, July 30, 2003, 6:38:44 AM, you wrote:
harder to be locked remotely, so that would mean that it would be
possible for 2 servers to access the same database file. And, that
would be asking for database corruption. Also, it could be a security
risk.
--
Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior System Engineer
ACCRA Group Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)
Wednesday, July 30, 2003, 6:38:44 AM, you wrote:
> It should be possible to have the database file on any location the server have access to.It's not the network speed that is a problem. It's that a file is
> To restrict database files to local drives makes no sense as
> Gigabit netzwork is todays standard.
> It should always be up to the user where to put the database file
> and not forced be implementation.
harder to be locked remotely, so that would mean that it would be
possible for 2 servers to access the same database file. And, that
would be asking for database corruption. Also, it could be a security
risk.
--
Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior System Engineer
ACCRA Group Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)