> Perhaps I am missing something, but doesn't this mean that after a
> call to ResultSet.isLast() the current record can no longer be
> changed with a positional update?

That was my concern too. As I wrote in another message, most likely we
will provide different fetchers for updatable and read-only cases.
This is not a big issue, since we will have to override only one method.

> If a programmer is so lame as to require isLast(), what is the
> likelihood that he has even bothered to read the Jaybird
> documentation? Or have I missed something important?

I agree that adding physical cursor movement into isLast() can cause
more pain than joy.

Roman