Subject Re: [Firebird-Architect] Re: Standard Conformance
Author Helen Borrie
At 07:31 AM 19/06/2003 +0000, you wrote:

>Very reasonable. But If I ask for feature that enable me to
>use standard DDL with Firebird (e.g. nameable constraints
>for domains), would this be considered a valid motive?
I'm trying to figure out what named constraints for domains would be needed
for. Can you give an example?

To me, a domain is itself a "named cluster of constraints". User-defined
domains in Firebird are in fact "named domains", since a system-controlled,
systematically-named domain is created in the metadata for every database