Subject | Re: Databases on NFS shares |
---|---|
Author | Roman Rokytskyy |
Post date | 2003-06-14T16:02:42Z |
Helen,
read-only database will be a nice idea... Currently I hardly can
imagine such deployment configuration for PC market.
What about SAN? Do they use NFS or they look for the client as local
filesystem? If SAN (are|can be) accessed via NFS, _and_ we introduce
distributed lock manager, we might get quite powerful system for
read/write mode. Without lock manager, only read-only mode. Any comments?
Regards,
Roman
> Ok...Should I then include a warning NOT to use this flag withI think we should find at least one use case when NFS even with
> Read/Write dbs?
read-only database will be a nice idea... Currently I hardly can
imagine such deployment configuration for PC market.
What about SAN? Do they use NFS or they look for the client as local
filesystem? If SAN (are|can be) accessed via NFS, _and_ we introduce
distributed lock manager, we might get quite powerful system for
read/write mode. Without lock manager, only read-only mode. Any comments?
Regards,
Roman