Subject Re: Vulcan: DSQL
Author paulruizendaal
--- In, Jim Starkey <jas@n...>
> I'm starting an important discussion of where DSQL fits into the
> world. Logically the topic belongs on architecture, but I think
> there are many more folks on the development list. Unless there is
> objection, I think it makes more sense to have the discussion on
> the other list. If this is a problem or hardship, please let me
> know.

Integrating a PL/SQL byte-code engine into FB is progressing nicely.
One of the next steps will be to move the Oracle-style SQL parser to
the engine, say as dialect 4. I intend to build it such, that it can
either generate blr or a ready-to-execute JRD_REQ structure. Hence
I'm interested in this discussion.

I don't subscribe to the dev list, because I find it too high volume
for my needs. Please keep it at the architecture list, perhaps with
an announcement on the dev list.

(hey, every community needs someone who's difficult :^)