Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] Index Selectivity Question (RFC) |
---|---|
Author | Doug Chamberlin |
Post date | 2001-07-20T16:21:51Z |
At 7/21/2001 03:10 AM (Saturday), Joseph wrote:
I know you are much more interested in Jim's comments but here are mine.
The only problem I have with your article is in the use of the term
"selectivity" as in "avoid selectivity". Selectivity is a measure of an
index's ability to select a record. If there are only 3 index values spread
over millions of records then the index's ability to select a specific
record using that record's index value is poor. If the index is unique then
its selectivity is excellent.
So, I would rephrase your article to say "avoid poor selectivity" and
attempt "good or high selectivity". You see ALL indexes have SOME
selectivity measure.
A small but important clarification.
>I would just like to request for comments on my article below so that IExcellent description of the problem your investigation into it!
>will know if my views are correct or not.
I know you are much more interested in Jim's comments but here are mine.
The only problem I have with your article is in the use of the term
"selectivity" as in "avoid selectivity". Selectivity is a measure of an
index's ability to select a record. If there are only 3 index values spread
over millions of records then the index's ability to select a specific
record using that record's index value is poor. If the index is unique then
its selectivity is excellent.
So, I would rephrase your article to say "avoid poor selectivity" and
attempt "good or high selectivity". You see ALL indexes have SOME
selectivity measure.
A small but important clarification.