|Subject||Re: [IB-Architect] Identifier naming woes|
|Author||Ann W. Harrison|
>At 04:38 PM 5/24/2001 -0400, David Jencks wrote:Well, it turns out there's a third possibility, which is to
> >Clearly we need to keep track of all dependencies somehow.
> >choices are:
> >use names, and if name changes update all dependent info,
require that all dependent entities be dropped before the column
name can be changed. And that's what's been implemented.
We have answers.