|Subject||Re: [IB-Architect] planning the use of blr codes|
|Author||Ann W. Harrison|
>At 04:28 PM 4/18/01 -0400, Ann W. Harrison wrote:At 04:59 PM 4/18/2001 -0400, Jim Starkey wrote:
> >So, what would the world think of reserving 174 to
> >be blr_user_id. That would take a single blr argument
> >which would be one of the set
> > blr_user_transaction
> > blr_user_connection
> > blr_user_role
> > ...
>Yeah. Although the Interbase role model is a single roleOK, so how would you represent multiple roles? For logging,
>identified at logon, a more useful model is multiple roles,
>each of which may be turned on or off during a session.
>Although I don't think this is the most critical short term
>feature on the menu, designing an interface that couldn't
>support it could be a problem down the road.
for example... ?
We have answers. I haven't a clue.