Subject | RE: [IB-Architect] Drop Generator... |
---|---|
Author | Jim Starkey |
Post date | 2001-03-22T17:58:29Z |
At 12:54 PM 3/22/01 -0500, Mark Shapiro wrote:
the space would hundreds of times bigger than the space reclaimed.
Cleaning up the name space has merit, but losing sleep over 8
crummy little bytes isn't worth it.
Jim Starkey
>>Not that I am aware of. At least not completely, meaning all the way to theA generater consumes 8 bytes of disk space. The code to reclaim
>>recovery of the storage the generator value was occupying on the generator
>>pages.
>>
>>The reason I am confident of this is because generators are outside of
>>transaction context so it gets more tricky what you can do with them once
>>they are created.
>>
>>If it did anything it would simply delete the record in the RDB$GENERATORS
>>table for the generator.
>
>If you delete a generator from RDB$GENERATORS, then backup and restore the
>database, does that completely remove the generator from the database?
>
the space would hundreds of times bigger than the space reclaimed.
Cleaning up the name space has merit, but losing sleep over 8
crummy little bytes isn't worth it.
Jim Starkey