Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] Re: Is it _really_ necessary to expose the location of the database file? |
---|---|
Author | Dennis Fantoni |
Post date | 2000-08-08T10:28:25Z |
Vince Duggan <vince@...> wrote in message
news:398FDAA7.340FAFAF@......
to the database, and be collected at one place. also, i think it is very
cool that interbase uses as few operating system specific features as
possible. Esp. with NT - one of the reasons interbase is so stable on NT is
probably that it uses so few microsoft dll's. ;-) i can create havoc on an
NT, and still have my interbase running.
--
Regards
Dennis Fantoni
df@...
dennis@...
Senior developer (Delphi interbase ) at Danasoft A/S - www.danasoft.dk
_______________________________________________
Ib-architect mailing list
Ib-architect@...
http://mers.com/mailman/listinfo/ib-architect
news:398FDAA7.340FAFAF@......
> Try this: ln -s actualDBname aliasnameI would prefer to have the option of having the list of aliases to be known
>
> What do you mean, it doesn't work on NT?? :-)
>
> Vince
to the database, and be collected at one place. also, i think it is very
cool that interbase uses as few operating system specific features as
possible. Esp. with NT - one of the reasons interbase is so stable on NT is
probably that it uses so few microsoft dll's. ;-) i can create havoc on an
NT, and still have my interbase running.
--
Regards
Dennis Fantoni
df@...
dennis@...
Senior developer (Delphi interbase ) at Danasoft A/S - www.danasoft.dk
_______________________________________________
Ib-architect mailing list
Ib-architect@...
http://mers.com/mailman/listinfo/ib-architect