Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] Its Out |
---|---|
Author | Dmitry Kuzmenko |
Post date | 2000-07-27T13:24:05Z |
Hello, Alexander!
Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
dbExpress seems to be very complex to use after BDE and IBX. Hope Jeff
wrote IBX version compatible with dbExpress. I mean, after using IBX
you will NEVER decide to "downsize" to dbExpress.
and thus gives new life to FIBC. So, there were free way before opensourcing IBX :-)
--
Dmitry Kuzmenko, Epsylon Technologies.
Welcome to http://ib.demo.ru/ (1251)
Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
> sourced now, who can guarantee it will continue to be ONE branch, notRead article about dbExpress architecture at community.borland.com.
> different engines with DIFFERENT APIs? It would be hard to support such
> different and unknown databases. So Inprise must make the decision - which
> company it will consider as the Interbase Software Company, or they should quit
> supporting IB via natural components.
dbExpress seems to be very complex to use after BDE and IBX. Hope Jeff
wrote IBX version compatible with dbExpress. I mean, after using IBX
you will NEVER decide to "downsize" to dbExpress.
> ISC) to develop it? If it's true, the community can look at Fib+, which is theFIBPlus have it's own way. It already supports IB 6 dialects (as I know),
> http://www.geocities.com/buzz_ss/buzz.html
> I think that the author will not be against such an idea.
and thus gives new life to FIBC. So, there were free way before opensourcing IBX :-)
--
Dmitry Kuzmenko, Epsylon Technologies.
Welcome to http://ib.demo.ru/ (1251)