At 01:18 PM 6/2/00 -0400, you wrote:

>>
>>Borland had it right since version 3.1 of Borland C++ for DOS.
>>If you are forced to use MSVC compiler, why don't you upgrade to version 6
>>as long as Bill has figured out this:
>>
>>>"STATUS This bug was corrected in Microsoft Visual C++, version 6.0."
>>
>
>Cheap. And until an hour and a half ago, I had no reason to do
>so. Sigh. Maybe I can charge Ann for it...

Yeah - and tell her this is "exceptionally" important. :)

Glebas