Subject | RE: [IB-Architect] Database names |
---|---|
Author | Leyne, Sean |
Post date | 2000-05-02T17:42:07Z |
Let me add to the list of 'properties' for each database.
- Shadow DB file name(s) (would allow for shadows to be easily 'broken'
from the master DB)
I'm sure that My next two items will prompt some discussion
- Authentication Name plug-in for DB
- Encryption Name Plug-in for DB
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Chamberlin [mailto:dchamberlin@...]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 11:05 AM
To: IB-Architect@egroups.com; IB-Architect@egroups.com;
IB-Architect@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [IB-Architect] Database names
As usual, Jim has offered some well considered arguments.
At 5/2/00 10:17 AM (Tuesday), Jim Starkey wrote:
sheer practicality of it than for following a principle. If you are
already
facile with using SQL to manipulate the database data then why not use
it
to manipulate the meta data as well?
As to the meta-meta-data of the database file mapping, I'm not so sure.
separate file for each database. How about:
<?XML version="1.0" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE ISCNS:FileMap SYSTEM "http://xml.interbase.com/FileMap.dtd'>
<ISCNS:FileMap xmtns:ISCNS='http://xml.interbase.com/'>
<Database>
<Alias>MyDB</Alias>
<File>C:\Data\DB01.GDB</File>
<File>C:\Data\DB02.GDB</File>
</Database>
<Database>
<Alias>MyOtherDB</Alias>
<File>D:\OtherDB.GDB</File>
</Database>
</FileMap>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Join Garden.com's affiliate program and enjoy numerous benefits.
To learn more click here:
http://click.egroups.com/1/2753/3/_/830676/_/957279805/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
IB-Architect-unsubscribe@onelist.com
- Shadow DB file name(s) (would allow for shadows to be easily 'broken'
from the master DB)
I'm sure that My next two items will prompt some discussion
- Authentication Name plug-in for DB
- Encryption Name Plug-in for DB
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Chamberlin [mailto:dchamberlin@...]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 11:05 AM
To: IB-Architect@egroups.com; IB-Architect@egroups.com;
IB-Architect@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [IB-Architect] Database names
As usual, Jim has offered some well considered arguments.
At 5/2/00 10:17 AM (Tuesday), Jim Starkey wrote:
>I my opinion (ever humble) configuration information internal to aI agree that metadata could/should reside in a database but more for the
>database should reside in the database.
sheer practicality of it than for following a principle. If you are
already
facile with using SQL to manipulate the database data then why not use
it
to manipulate the meta data as well?
As to the meta-meta-data of the database file mapping, I'm not so sure.
>And isn't XML to hold of list of name/file pairs a bit of overkill?I don't think we are talking about just a simple list, unless you mean a
separate file for each database. How about:
<?XML version="1.0" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE ISCNS:FileMap SYSTEM "http://xml.interbase.com/FileMap.dtd'>
<ISCNS:FileMap xmtns:ISCNS='http://xml.interbase.com/'>
<Database>
<Alias>MyDB</Alias>
<File>C:\Data\DB01.GDB</File>
<File>C:\Data\DB02.GDB</File>
</Database>
<Database>
<Alias>MyOtherDB</Alias>
<File>D:\OtherDB.GDB</File>
</Database>
</FileMap>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Join Garden.com's affiliate program and enjoy numerous benefits.
To learn more click here:
http://click.egroups.com/1/2753/3/_/830676/_/957279805/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
IB-Architect-unsubscribe@onelist.com