Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] Database names |
---|---|
Author | Jim Starkey |
Post date | 2000-05-02T16:22:35Z |
At 10:15 AM 5/2/00 -0600, Tim Uckun wrote:
or not Microsoft does this well, the API permits it. More to the
point, the registery API writes individuals nodes atomically. A
text editor replaces the whole thing every time. This is one of the
reasons databases were invented.
looking for a book opportunity.
Jim Starkey
>The registry is a database responsible for its own consistency. Whether
>
>I don't understand how the registry avoids this problem. Surely I could be
>editing the registry while a program was modifying the contents of it (or
>visa versa). We could overwrite each others changes.
>
or not Microsoft does this well, the API permits it. More to the
point, the registery API writes individuals nodes atomically. A
text editor replaces the whole thing every time. This is one of the
reasons databases were invented.
>I think I remember reading someplace that relational theory dictates that"Relation theory" generally means an underemployed consultant is
>all schema information be kept in the database itself. I presume this
>would include any aliases.
>
looking for a book opportunity.
Jim Starkey