Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] Database names |
---|---|
Author | Doug Chamberlin |
Post date | 2000-05-02T15:56:27Z |
At 5/2/00 11:25 AM (Tuesday), Jim Starkey wrote:
Goods points. I had not even thought of the concurrent access issue yet.
I also thought we were considering moving the file list from the current
method (of chaining the files together via internal references in each
file) to a more centrally maintained list. If we are not considering
changing that then I like your simple ASCII file idea:
been pointed out to be problematic.
>Other than breaking the layer and destroying database integrity,[Elaboration on the above snipped]
>this isn't a bad idea.
Goods points. I had not even thought of the concurrent access issue yet.
I also thought we were considering moving the file list from the current
method (of chaining the files together via internal references in each
file) to a more centrally maintained list. If we are not considering
changing that then I like your simple ASCII file idea:
>How about:Gets us the benefits of aliases without too many other changes, which have
>
>MyDB C:\Data\DB01.GDB
>MyOtherDB D:\OtherDB.GDB
><end-of-file>
been pointed out to be problematic.