Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] Backward compatability with previous versions of gdb files |
---|---|
Author | Jim Starkey |
Post date | 2000-04-30T20:59:02Z |
At 01:10 PM 4/30/00 -0700, Bill Karwin wrote:
existing systems is utterly unacceptable. One of the original
design goals of the DSRI (DEC Standard Relational Interface)
from which OSRI derived was to allow rolling upgrades -- that
a installation would never EVER breaking running systems.
To break with this policy in the name of "quality assurance"
begs the question of the meaning of "quality."
I am very sorry this happened. I will do what I can to see
the current situation rectified and the practice never repeated
in the future.
Jim Starkey
>I beg to differ, sir. I think an installation that breaks
>If it's feasible to do so, I think it'd be great for IB 6.x (where x >
>0) to add this capability. However, I would prefer to see 6.0 be
>released _without_ this capability, just so folks can use it. If we
>demand more features from IB 6.0, it'll just delay its release. I don't
>think it's too complex or unreasonable to require a gbak&restore to
>migrate one's databases to IB6 (dialect 1).
>
existing systems is utterly unacceptable. One of the original
design goals of the DSRI (DEC Standard Relational Interface)
from which OSRI derived was to allow rolling upgrades -- that
a installation would never EVER breaking running systems.
To break with this policy in the name of "quality assurance"
begs the question of the meaning of "quality."
I am very sorry this happened. I will do what I can to see
the current situation rectified and the practice never repeated
in the future.
Jim Starkey