Subject | RE: Re: [IB-Architect] Pros and cons... |
---|---|
Author | Claudio Valderrama C. |
Post date | 2000-03-22T01:17:49Z |
Markus, can you expand on this one a bit?
Perhaps we are speaking about different things, but anyway: wasn't LIBS
supposed to use IPC (shared memory) on Windows when using a path that
doesn't include the server name? What's the difference with True Local
Access that you wrote about?
C.
---------
Claudio Valderrama C.
Ingeniero en Informática - Consultor independiente
http://members.xoom.com/cvalde
Perhaps we are speaking about different things, but anyway: wasn't LIBS
supposed to use IPC (shared memory) on Windows when using a path that
doesn't include the server name? What's the difference with True Local
Access that you wrote about?
C.
---------
Claudio Valderrama C.
Ingeniero en Informática - Consultor independiente
http://members.xoom.com/cvalde
> --- In IB-Architect@onelist.com, "Markus Kemper" <mkemper@i...> wrote:
> a) True Local access on UNIX platforms. Meaning that
>
> connect /dbs/mydb.gdb
>
> does not go through loopback to connect. True local
> access can yield better performance for 'local' apps.
> It is my hope that the performance of loopback could be
> optimized to make it comparable to 'local' access and
> resolve this performance issue.