Subject Re: [IB-Architect] Re : License Question
Author Markus Kemper
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding your description but it sounds
> like you were saying that if one process acquires the lock it holds
> it until someone else signals it that it wants it. Even if the
> first process doesn't need the lock anymore it still keeps it.

I thought he said that a lock doesn't need to be physically
freed if aquirable when needed and available. Perhaps I am
misunderstanding this as well.