Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] Re: [IB-Priorities] Isolation level implemetation |
---|---|
Author | Dmitry Kuzmenko |
Post date | 2000-12-22T10:29:03Z |
Hello, Jim!
Jim Starkey wrote:
I don't need "dirty read" isolation mode, and never dreamed about, but it is "standard" isolation mode, you like it or
not.
At least I will not ever suggest to implement standard Repeatable Read isolation level :-)
--
Dmitry Kuzmenko, Epsylon Technologies.
Welcome to http://ib.demo.ru/ (1251)
Jim Starkey wrote:
> If you feel a need for "READ UNCOMMITTED", it's really mother nature:-) Since I'm representing russian Interbase users, I'm talking not for myself :-)
> trying to tell you that your design is all screwed up and you should
> seriously consider a career change.
I don't need "dirty read" isolation mode, and never dreamed about, but it is "standard" isolation mode, you like it or
not.
At least I will not ever suggest to implement standard Repeatable Read isolation level :-)
--
Dmitry Kuzmenko, Epsylon Technologies.
Welcome to http://ib.demo.ru/ (1251)