Subject Re: [IB-Architect] UDF and null
Author Ann W. Harrison
At 11:38 AM 12/2/2000 +1100, Helen Borrie wrote:
>I wrote:
> >In the long run, the right thing to do with UDF's is to
> >replace them (85% confidence).
>Oh? why? replace with what?

Because they're horribly insecure. Yes, there's no doubt
that we'd have to retain the mechanism for upward compatibility.
The replacement is ill-defined, but I think it smells like coffee.


We have answers.
I have questions.