Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] re - ODS changes |
---|---|
Author | Dmitry Kuzmenko |
Post date | 2000-11-13T08:19:23Z |
Hello, Fabricio!
Fabricio Araujo wrote:
That's why LIMIT is preferable if it is going to be released in new IB version.
--
Dmitry Kuzmenko, Epsylon Technologies.
Fabricio Araujo wrote:
> Yes, but I prefer TOP <n> syntax. It's part of SQL standard (if I am wrong, Diane certainly will flame me ;-) ) .Not a big deal. TOP <n> and LIMIT <n> are equivalent. Except LIMIT <n>,<m>.
> So, why we don't try to follow the standard... LIMIT <n> appear to be a PostGRE and MySQL specific keyword...
That's why LIMIT is preferable if it is going to be released in new IB version.
--
Dmitry Kuzmenko, Epsylon Technologies.