|Subject||Re: [IB-Architect] System table change|
>In terms of code added to the server, they're trivial, particularly
>I however wonder wether such bytes and bits manipulations are really
>good additions to the server, not even taking into account the
>addition of one or more new data types.
if we build a good general 'harness' so the individual functions can
be added simply.
>I'd vote for some well chosen and carefully crafted UDFs to be addedUDF's are lousy for aggregate functions ...
>(to the default UDF library provided with the server).