Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] System table change |
---|---|
Author | Ann Harrison |
Post date | 2000-11-07T19:06:06Z |
Chris Jewell wrote:
find that those changes are already done. If I've got to make an
idiot of myself, at least the final result is good.
Best,
Ann
>Search for dsc_num_type_decimal in jrd/dsc.h. I chose numeric=1 andDuh. Time to get my head out of the sand, I guess. Delighted to
>decimal=2 so that the subtype of the result of an arithmetic operation
>on mixed exact types is the MAX of the subtypes of the operands.
>Putting DECIMAL between "the base storage type" and NUMERIC would make
>it mildly annoying to follow the type promotion rules in the standard.
find that those changes are already done. If I've got to make an
idiot of myself, at least the final result is good.
Best,
Ann